Sports Medicine – Open
Contemporary perspectives of core stability training for dynamic athletic performance: a survey of athletes, coaches, sports science and medicine practitionersBackground
Core stability training has grown in popularity over 25 years, initially for back pain prevention or therapy. Subsequently, it developed as a mode of exercise training for health, fitness and sport. The scientific basis for traditional core stability exercise has recently been questioned and challenged, especially in reference to dynamic athletic performance. Reviews have involved clarity on what constitutes anatomy and performance of the core, especially in healthy and uninjured people. Clinical research suggests that traditional core stability training is inappropriate for development of fitness for heath and sports performance. However, commonly used methods of measuring core stability in research don’t reflect functional nature of core stability in uninjured, healthy and athletic populations. Recent reviews have proposed a more dynamic, whole body approach to training core stabilization, and research has begun to live and report efficacy of those modes training. the aim of this study was to assess extent to which these developments have informed people currently working and participating in sport.Methods
An online survey questionnaire was developed around common themes on core stability training as defined within the current scientific literature and circulated to a sample population of individuals working and participating in sport. Survey results were assessed against key elements of the present scientific debateResults
Perceptions on anatomy and performance of the core were gathered from a representative cohort of athletes, coaches, sports science and medicine practitioners (n = 241), along side their views on effectiveness of varied current and traditional exercise training modes. hottest method of testing and measuring core function was subjective assessment through observation (43%), while 1 / 4 (22%) believed there was no effective method of measurement. Perceptions of individuals in sport reflect the scientific debate, and practitioners have adopted a more functional approach to core stability training. There was strong support for loaded, compound exercises performed upright, compared to moderate support for traditional core stability exercises. half the participants (50%) within the survey, however, still support a standard isolation core stability training.Conclusion
Perceptions in applied practice on core stability training for dynamic athletic performance are aligned to an outsized extent to the scientific literature.Key points
Core stability training for healthy and athletic populations has recently been questioned and challenged in scientific literature. The narrow definition of both the anatomy, spinal region between pelvis and diaphragm, and therefore the method of coaching the core through the isolation of muscles during this region doesn’t relate to full body core function that characterises dynamic athletic performance. แทงบอลออนไลน์เงินสด
The survey reveals that this is often reflected in opinions of individuals working and participating in sport. half the participants identified the world between and including the pelvic and shoulder girdles because the core. Majority supported functional loaded exercises such farmer’s walk (87%) and barbell squats (84%) as effective exercises for the event of core stability.
Despite the support for a more functional approach, selected traditional core stability training methods do retain a particular amount of support; isometric plank exercise (56%) and unstable stability ball exercises (41%). Many respondents (42%) felt that core function should be measured subjectively through observation of sporting and or exercise performance.